Sunday, February 17, 2008

Ok , we agree. Obama is a small time porker compared to the average.... a tennsie weensie porker compared to H. But we are not so concerned about comparing him to Hillary..hopefully she is history. For the purposes of these discussions, I thought we were comparing Obama to McCain.

I am sure you can always find someone to compare Obama to that makes him look a bit more acceptable . Attila the Hun was a really bad guy, but he was nicer than Hitler ergo Attilla is nice.! Not a logical arguement. Maybe I am wrong but thought the premise of your "gauntlet" was we were comparing him to McCain.

As Missy said ----advantage McCain.

1 comment:

Maker's Mark said...

The fact that Obama is 3 times better than Clinton was only an aside, as well as a response to YOUR lumping them together. You brought her up first.

Obama a)advocates for transparency in spending bills in a way that McCain does not

b) when you factor in the cost of war, McCain outspends Obama by a factor of about 10 thousand.

You need to respond to THOSE points, before you start quibble about Hillary.

And at the end of the day Obama is a relatively mild earmarker. Better than the average republican or democrat.